Living system dossier Release 4.1.0 · f9780700

Theme Intelligence

From public signal to inspectable knowledge.

The platform continuously maps a subject, separates claims from narratives, verifies them against multiple evidence spaces and publishes every verdict with its proof path.

Scientific Truth Substrate

STS reads licensed scientific documents into immutable sentences, table cells and formulas. Models propose structure; deterministic validators and the Constitution alone commit proof.

STS 1.0.0 · Parser rules visible in every derivation

Studies: 9752
Full texts: 3372
Versions: 60296
Sentences: 21705447
Tables: 101494
Formulas: 42692
Assertions: 11665538
Verified relations: 0

Some studies are metadata-only because no reusable full text is available. They remain visible as an evidence limitation.

Live knowledge layer

What the system currently knows about Longevity

These figures are read from the current knowledge graph. They can change independently of a software deployment as new public evidence is processed.

Evidence items

38618

Deduplicated public sources

Current claims

2443

Canonical factual statements

Proof-path coverage

43%

1051 of 2443 claims linked

Mapped actors

Current theme-specific map

Intelligence flywheel

Every pass makes the next research question sharper.

Observe

Collect public science, official material, editorial reporting and social signals.

Normalize

Deduplicate, identify language and preserve origin and provenance.

Structure

Turn material into concepts, questions, actors, narratives and atomic claims.

Verify

Test claims against relevant evidence and explicit applicability boundaries.

Connect

Expose how sources, actors, narratives, questions and proof paths relate.

Refocus

Coverage gaps become the next research frontier instead of hidden uncertainty.

Signal to proof

A verdict is not a label. It is a navigable evidence object.

Models may extract and critique. Only the deterministic constitution commits the multi-axis verdict and freezes the proof bundle used by the platform and sister products.

Constitution

Proof schema

theme-knowledge-pack/v4

Export contract

1 · Model proposal

Extraction and critique leave traces, confidence and candidate evidence; they do not create truth by themselves.

2 · Deterministic quorum

Explicit rules commit, hold or contradict the claim and enforce applicability and evidence thresholds.

3 · Eternal proof trail

The current claim, append-only claim events and versioned proof bundle remain inspectable and exportable.

Knowledge model

The graph explains what each number means.

Questions define the frontier

A question organizes investigation. It does not receive a truth verdict; the atomic claims beneath it do.

Claims carry verdicts

Support, strength, applicability, fidelity, confidence and lifecycle remain separate axes instead of one misleading score.

Evidence creates proof paths

Every active link records whether evidence supports, contradicts or merely contextualizes a specific claim.

Actors stay contextual

Credibility is always theme- and time-window-specific, includes sample size and never becomes a global person score.

Narratives show public motion

Narratives reveal which claims travel together, who amplifies them and where attention diverges from evidence.

Synthesis remains traceable

Briefs and knowledge packs are projections of versioned objects, not detached AI summaries.

Executable process map

22 persisted production steps

This sequence is rendered from the same catalogue used by the autonomous pipeline. A code change cannot silently leave this process map behind.

Latest run

Running · 03.11.2026 · 13:04 UTC

Process hierarchy

System goal → phase → production step → governed artifact

Level 1 · System Level 2 · Phase Level 3 · Steps Level 4 · Artifact

Root process

Autonomous Theme Intelligence run

A theme, steering priorities and budgets initiate one causal knowledge-building run.

1

Phase 1

Research frontier

Defines the thematic ontology, concepts and open research frontier.

1 production step

Ontology

Governed handoff

Ontology and research frontier
2

Phase 2

Signal acquisition

Discovers and collects relevant public material across evidence spaces.

2 production steps

Discover sources Collect signals

Governed handoff

Deduplicated public signals
3

Phase 3

Scientific reading

Resolves studies, reads lawful full text and creates stable sentences, tables, formulas and assertions.

8 production steps

Targeted research Resolve scientific works Acquire lawful documents Parse documents Extract scientific assertions Normalize quantities Interpret formulas Appraise studies

Governed handoff

Source-addressed scientific statements
4

Phase 4

Evidence preparation

Normalizes material and projects it into typed, provenance-preserving evidence.

1 production step

Project evidence

Governed handoff

Typed evidence objects
5

Phase 5

Claim formation

Extracts atomic statements, assigns their type and merges semantic duplicates.

4 production steps

Extract claims Type claims Canonicalize claims Link claims to source nodes

Governed handoff

Canonical atomic claims
6

Phase 6

Truthing and proofing

Fills evidence gaps and commits inspectable multi-axis verdicts.

2 production steps

Validate source anchors Adjudicate claims

Governed handoff

Verdicts and proof bundles
7

Phase 7

Knowledge graph

Relates claims, evidence, actors and narratives and produces traceable syntheses.

2 production steps

Build graph and narratives Synthesize knowledge

Governed handoff

Knowledge graph and syntheses
8

Phase 8

Intelligence outputs

Projects governed knowledge into metrics, briefs and stable consumer contracts.

2 production steps

Calculate actor metrics Publish brief

Governed handoff

Metrics, briefs and knowledge packs

Linear execution order

The hierarchy explains responsibility and outputs; the sequence below shows the exact causal order persisted for every run.

01
Research frontier

Ontology
02
Signal acquisition

Discover sources
03
Signal acquisition

Collect signals
04
Scientific reading

Targeted research
05
Scientific reading

Resolve scientific works
06
Scientific reading

Acquire lawful documents
07
Scientific reading

Parse documents
08
Scientific reading

Extract scientific assertions
09
Scientific reading

Normalize quantities
10
Scientific reading

Interpret formulas
11
Scientific reading

Appraise studies
12
Evidence preparation

Project evidence
13
Claim formation

Extract claims
14
Claim formation

Type claims
15
Claim formation

Canonicalize claims
16
Claim formation

Link claims to source nodes
17
Truthing and proofing

Validate source anchors
18
Truthing and proofing

Adjudicate claims
19
Knowledge graph

Build graph and narratives
20
Knowledge graph

Synthesize knowledge
21
Intelligence outputs

Calculate actor metrics
22
Intelligence outputs

Publish brief

Evidence landscape

Bar length is relative to the largest evidence space, not a fictitious completeness score.

Editorial 15784

Official 229

Science 9816

Social 12789

Verdict landscape

A live distribution of current atomic claims. Insufficient is an explicit research state, not a system failure.

Contradicted 71

Insufficient 2060

Mixed 80

Not testable 7

Supported 225

Intelligence platform

Public, thematic knowledge

Evidence, claims and proof paths
Narratives, actors and theme-specific credibility
Versioned knowledge packs for sister products

Sister product, for example Longevity

Personal application is a separate boundary

No blood values or personal measurements here
No adherence, symptoms or individual outcome logs
Sister products consume public proof bundles through a stable contract

Inspect the system